You have probably seen both of these charts in your life, but probably never together. The blue line shows oil production in Alaska since 1978, after oil began flowing down the Trans-Alaska Pipeline. It peaked at 2 million barrels per day of production in 1988, but has since declined to 577,819 barrels a day at the end of the State’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2012. The red line highlights the population of Alaska over the same period. It was 411,600 in 1978 and has grown to approximately 730,000 people today.
That means at peak production in 1988 Alaska was producing 3.8 barrels a day per person. However, in 2012 that rate has declined to only 0.79 barrels a day per person. That is nearly five times less on a per capita basis. This has serious economic implications because of the extreme dependency the State of Alaska government has on oil taxes to pay for government services. According to the Alaska Department of Revenue, in fiscal year 2011 oil revenue accounted for 92% of the State’s unrestricted revenue.
This is money without “strings attached”, unlike Federal program receipts and investment returns from accounts like the Permanent Fund. In total, the State collected over $8 billion last year in energy taxes of various types. These revenues fund a lion’s share of the State operating and capital budgets, providing money for countless programs throughout Alaska.
Oil averaged over $112 per barrel in fiscal year 2012. Oil production tax rates escalate 0.4% for every dollar the net value rises above $30. The rate increases 0.1% when the value rises above $92.5. As a result, Alaska continues to be flush with oil revenues at today’s very high prices, regardless of the continual decline in the amount of oil we are producing. However, our population continues to grow and shows no sign of stopping.
Therefore, we are more sensitive than ever to a decline in oil prices. Alaska has never seen prices this high, nor have we had our tax revenues so reliant on a progressivity price factor. It has been a windfall for government at these high prices, but we have not yet felt the pain of what the reverse feels like if prices decline.
Many politicians in Juneau seem to be gambling that prices will stay high for ever and continue to mask our declining production problem. Others are taking the more realistic long-term view that prices have always been volatile. In response, we need to control the level of spending to more sustainable levels, attempt to diversify our revenue streams, and most importantly, make every effort to incentivize more oil production.
Texas and North Dakota have demonstrated that multi-decade stagnate or declining oil production levels can be turned around. They have each added over 500,000 barrels per day of new oil production in the last few years. Alaska must endeavor to do the same.